Sunday, October 21, 2012

Recap: Red Bull New York vs. Sporting Kansas City | MLS Soccer ...

Red Bull New York managed to clinch a playoff berth on Saturday despite being held to a 0-0 draw by Sporting Kansas City at Red Bull Arena.

The result sees New York (15-9-9) improve to 54 points on the season, but it was D.C. United's 3-2 defeat of the Columbus Crew on Saturday that solidified the Red Bulls' place in the postseason.

Kansas City (17-7-9) remains on top of the Eastern Conference on 60 points and will look to seal the top seed in the East with a result in its final match of the season.

New York dictated play for much of the opening period but finally began turning possession into clear scoring opportunities in the second-half.

The Red Bulls came within inches of getting in front in the 64th minute when Jimmy Nielsen produced a sprawling one-handed save off of a shot from Thierry Henry. Kenny Cooper collected the rebound and slid a ball across the face of goal that was nearly turned in by a Sporting defender, but it instead struck the face of Nielsen from point-blank range.

Luis Robles came up big at the other end for the New York, denying Kei Kamara's header five minutes from time with a quick reaction save. It was the only time the rookie 'keeper was called into action on the night.

Game Notes

Source: http://www.heraldonline.com/2012/10/20/4351790/recap-red-bull-new-york-vs-sporting.html

gas prices rising stars challenge star trek 2 kathy ireland brooke mueller all star weekend lent

Saturday, October 20, 2012

How the brain forms categories

ScienceDaily (Oct. 19, 2012) ? How do we manage to recognize a friend's face, regardless of the light conditions, the person's hairstyle or make-up? Why do we always hear the same words, whether they are spoken by a man or woman, in a loud or soft voice? It is due to the amazing skill of our brain to turn a wealth of sensory information into a number of defined categories and objects. The ability to create constants in a changing world feels natural and effortless to a human, but it is extremely difficult to train a computer to perform the task.

At the IMP in Vienna, neurobiologist Simon Rumpel and his post-doc Brice Bathellier have been able to show that certain properties of neuronal networks in the brain are responsible for the formation of categories. In experiments with mice, the researchers produced an array of sounds and monitored the activity of nerve cell-clusters in the auditory cortex. They found that groups of 50 to 100 neurons displayed only a limited number of different activity-patterns in response to the different sounds.

The scientists then selected two basis sounds that produced different response patterns and constructed linear mixtures from them. When the mixture ratio was varied continuously, the answer was not a continuous change in the activity patters of the nerve cells, but rather an abrupt transition. Such dynamic behavior is reminiscent of the behavior of artificial attractor-networks that have been suggested by computer scientists as a solution to the categorization problem.

The findings in the activity patters of neurons were backed up by behavioral experiments with mice. The animals were trained to discriminate between two sounds. They were then exposed to a third sound and their reaction was tracked. Whether the answer to the third tone was more like the reaction to the first or the second one, was used as an indicator of the similarity of perception. By looking at the activity patters in the auditory cortex, the scientists were able to predict the reaction of the mice.

The new findings that are published in the current issue of the journal Neuron, demonstrate that discrete network states provide a substrate for category formation in brain circuits. The authors suggest that the hierarchical structure of discrete representations might be essential for elaborate cognitive functions such as language processing.

Share this story on Facebook, Twitter, and Google:

Other social bookmarking and sharing tools:


Story Source:

The above story is reprinted from materials provided by Research Institute of Molecular Pathology, via AlphaGalileo.

Note: Materials may be edited for content and length. For further information, please contact the source cited above.


Journal Reference:

  1. Brice Bathellier, Lyubov Ushakova, Simon Rumpel. Discrete Neocortical Dynamics Predict Behavioral Categorization of Sounds. Neuron, 2012; 76 (2): 435 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.07.008

Note: If no author is given, the source is cited instead.

Disclaimer: This article is not intended to provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of ScienceDaily or its staff.

Source: http://feeds.sciencedaily.com/~r/sciencedaily/top_news/~3/EKSYG81c3_U/121019092933.htm

tenebrae the lake house petrino arkansas roy williams matt lauer divine mercy chaplet albert pujols

Re: Buttons Disabled in FTM2012 - Family Tree Maker software ...

Hi David. Sorry it took me so long to get back to this thread.

I took a look at what you suggested in the Sync Options. My system is already set up to update Manually, so that isn't the problem for me.

Sometimes my buttons are available and sometimes they are greyed out and unavailable. There can only be one of two things causing this, as far as I can tell: (1) poor programming or (2) an intentional bug placed in the program to persuade people not to sync too often due to server load issues. In either case, this issue needs to be fixed by the developers of FTM since it limits the functionality of the software and makes it less than what we purchased.

Source: http://boards.ancestry.co.uk/topics.software.famtreemaker/8993.1.2.2/mb.ashx

chia seeds embers shannon brown mike rowe shld 2012 sec football schedule medifast

Endearing ?How?s Your News?? Goes The ECommerce Route With $5 Downloads

Screen Shot 2012-10-20 at 2.07.13 PMHow's Your News began 15 years ago when a set of developmentally disabled adults hopped on a bus and travelled around the country interviewing folks on the street. The mixture of charm, astuteness, and fascination with the little things that these reporters exhibited has always been great fun and their work is a real tonic in this age of blowhards blowing hard at each other.

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Techcrunch/~3/7-yJN6V8bFQ/

saints vs 49ers vanessa marcil 49 ers frank gore frank gore nfl games jesus montero

Wednesday, October 17, 2012

(Some) Mothers are Writers ? Pickle Me This

October 16, 2012

On Harriet?s long-form birth certificate, it is written that her mother is a writer. And while I don?t remember much of those blurry days after she was born, when our world was exploded pieces held together with love and hanging on just barely, I remember filling out that form, crouching over my laptop on our coffee table. When we?d got to Mother?s Occupation, we?d paused for a moment. I was three weeks into maternity leave from a job I wouldn?t go back to, from the least meaningful job title in the universe, which was ?research administrator.? We couldn?t write that, and besides, I was no longer one. ?Why not say, ?writer??? my husband suggested, and so we did.

It is often noted as monumental, that moment when a writer learns to call herself as such, when she gathers the confidence, courage and faith necessary to embark upon a creative path. Which I don?t have a whole lot of truck with. I think we sentimentalize these things too much, that we spend too much time with our heads up our asses, and that a woman staring into the mirror practicing calling herself a writer is like Annie Dillard?s writer who ?himself only likes the role, the thought of himself in a hat.? I would argue that more important that learning to call oneself a writer is to write and (even better) to write well and to get the work out there so that everyone will know you?re a writer, and what you think doesn?t really matter.*

So this isn?t about how I lied on official documentation and was professionally transformed, never to administrate research ever again. This isn?t about how I learned to call myself a writer, but instead about how everybody?s wrong about motherhood (and by ?everybody?, I mean mainly The Atlantic and Newsweek).

Something funny happened started happening as soon as I got pregnant in 2008. Professionally speaking, research administration aside, it hadn?t been a great time for me. I was a year out of a graduate creative writing program that had failed to take me places, my classmates were publishing books and I was getting rejection after rejection from lit mags. That post-school thing is always brutal, and from creative writing programs in particular. I remember Anne Patchett writing in her memoir of her friendship with Lucy Grealy how they finished the Iowa Writers? Workshop and had to ?write to save their lives? (I paraphrase). It wasn?t working for me. And so when I got pregnant, it seemed like the writing thing was going to be put aside for awhile. At least I would have another focus.

Life, it seemed, would have other plans. Coinciding with my first trimester were some interesting writing opportunities, an invitation to speak on a panel about literary blogging with the Governor General, increased attention to my blog, and some wonderful new writerly connections. By the time Harriet was born, I?d started writing book reviews, had a couple of stories published, and cheques were arriving pretty regularly, even if they were pitifully small. So when I wrote, ?Writer? on her birth certificate, I wasn?t entirely delusional. But it wasn?t entirely true yet either.

I suppose it?s still not wholly true, if we?re speaking in terms of finances, because if I didn?t have a husband who worked full time, we?d be in trouble around here. But I?ll tell you this much, because I?m proud of it, and not because it?s the most important thing, because it isn?t: every month, I make our rent. It?s something. Since I became a mother 3.5 years ago, I?ve managed to put together a hard-scrabbled, deeply fulfilling professional life involving writing, editing, teaching and reviewing. And while motherhood has not been integral to this, as though it unleashed some deep creative fount within me, neither has it been an impediment. In fact, it?s helped hugely with the process in practical terms. It gave me a reason to leave my boring 9-5 job. It?s been the inspiration for some of the best stuff I?ve ever written. It?s given me the ability to focus, to sit down and get the words out right. Harriet has been in playschool since September and I?ve had mornings for working, and I promise you that I?ve not wasted away a single one.

Now obviously, motherhood is not necessary for career success, for many it really does stand in the way, and plenty of writers have really done quite well without kids. Plenty of mothers are also happy enough to be focusing on motherhood alone. Many jobs don?t mix with motherhood quite so tidily. Quite obviously too, our rent is fairly cheap and I could stand to be way more successful. And furthermore, fortune has been good to me. I am enormously privileged. But?

I am thinking about all this now in connection with Jessa Crispin?s column ?The Pram in the Hall?, about how fraught is the question of whether or not to have children for creative professionals in particular. She writes, ?The reason why it?s so difficult to think through your decision is because people keep pretending like there is one way this motherhood thing could go, when in reality there are millions.? Which she sees as terrifying as it is rife with potential, but from where I stand now it?s mostly the latter. Like everything with parenthood, when people complain about kids being expensive, demands on parents? time, how you have to give your kids your all, how you just have to have an exer-saucer just you wait, I throw up my arms and shriek, ?It doesn?t have to be this way!? There is not only one way this motherhood thing can go. Because life happens. Also, free will doesn?t get taken out along with the placenta.

For mothers, as with women, and as with people (and I?ve made the connection between mothers and people before), there are reassuringly myriad ways to be. We have to broaden and complicate our understanding of what motherhood is and who mothers are if we ever want the conversation about motherhood to be one from which we actually learn something.

*Obviously, I was a child in the 1980s when our education system was robust, my teachers told me I could anything, and my parents underlined this point over and over. So I can afford to be so flippant.

Source: http://www.picklemethis.com/2012/10/16/some-mothers-are-writers/

baby found alive in morgue rockies